The Radeon Pro W5700 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 960 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $14.41 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W5700
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 6% cheaper – $215.32 vs $229.73
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 41% less energy – 120 vs 205 Watts
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 960 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Average FPS
98
100%
Min 1% FPS
54
100%
Price, €
€215.32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.19/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
56%
Min 1% FPS
25
46%
Price, €
€229.73
93%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
53%
Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 960 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 960 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon Pro W5700 vs GeForce GTX 960 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon Pro W5700
Nov 19th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.663 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
31%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
28%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon Pro W5700 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 19th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
205 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
120.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 37.7 GPixel/s |
270.7 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 75.39 GTexel/s |
8.663 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.413 TFLOPS |