Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3566 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon X5680 - 131 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 35 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Xeon | Collection | Athlon |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |