Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms Core i7-2600 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 3237 days newer than Core i7-2600.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 18% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i7-2600 - 303 vs 256 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i7-2600 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-2600
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 156 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i7-2600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i7 |
Picasso | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |