Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 3728 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 2% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon X5680 - 130 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 58 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€84.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €84.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 58 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |