Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4370 outperforms Xeon X5680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4370 is 1618 days newer than Xeon X5680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5680
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4370 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4370
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Xeon X5680 - 55 vs 45 FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Xeon X5680 - 54 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€55.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €55.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5680 | vs | Intel Core i3-4370 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |