Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon W3680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2704 days newer than Xeon W3680.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3680
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 17% better in Rust than Xeon W3680 - 185 vs 158 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3680 - 24 vs 12 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.45
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 243 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3680 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |