Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2538 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 4% better in The Last of Us Part I than Xeon W3670 - 133 vs 128 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon W3670 - 24 vs 12 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
133
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |