Buy on Amazon
€35.49
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1820 outperforms Xeon E5645 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1820 is 1356 days newer than Xeon E5645.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5645
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Performs up to 1% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5645 - 149 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than Intel Xeon E5645 - 53 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5645 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
149
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Celeron G1820 2,7GHz LGA1150 2MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 174 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E5645
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5645 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
|---|---|---|
| Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
| Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
| Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 80 W | TDP | 53 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
