Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2678 v3 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Celeron G1820 - 177 vs 156 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 - 53 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
156
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2678 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell-E/EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
120 W | TDP | 53 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |