Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2670 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2670 is 8 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2670
- Performs up to 1% better in Valheim than FX-6200 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 115 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2670 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
115 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |