Buy on Amazon
€51.75
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $2057
Availability
MSRP in USD: $2057
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2667 v3 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2667 v3 is 358 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3
- Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Celeron G3900 - 213 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 - 51 vs 135 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
211
99%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2,80GHz Tray CPU
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v3 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
| Gainestown, Haswell-E/EP, Ivy Bridge, Sandy Bridge-EP/EX | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 135 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
