Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 1955 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 60 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 55% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 360 vs 232 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
360
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€149.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €149.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |