Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2400G outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2400G is 1625 days newer than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 60 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Performs up to 11% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 166 vs 150 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €74.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58184 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Single-Core
426
40.30274361400189%
Multi-Core
2198
66.72738312082575%
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |