Buy on Amazon
€118.58
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $278
Availability
MSRP in USD: $278
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-3770 outperforms Xeon E5-2630L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-3770 is 490 days older than Xeon E5-2630L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-3770 - 60 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770 - 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3770
- Performs up to 7% better in Rust than Xeon E5-2630L v2 - 163 vs 153 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€118.58
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3770 Quad-Core Prozessor (3,4 GHz, 4 Core LGA 1155, BX80637I73770)
Buy for €118.58 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Xeon E5-2630L v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i7-3770
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630L v2 | vs | Intel Core i7-3770 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 2.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
60 W | TDP | 77 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E5-2630L v2 or Core i7-3770
Rust, 1920 x 1080, High
5 FPS
€155.4/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050
Core i7-3770
8 GB, 1 TB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€777
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
