Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 800 days older than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 3% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 544 vs 530 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
530
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |