Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1191 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 118% better in Immortals of Aveum than FX-6200 - 48 vs 22 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 8 vs 6 threads
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 188 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 3 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |