Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1551 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dirt 5 than Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 170 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
170
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€180.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €180.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |