Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Xeon E3-1240 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2321 days newer than Xeon E3-1240.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1240
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 80 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 16% better in Rust than Xeon E3-1240 - 185 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1240 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
185
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1240 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |