Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Xeon E3-1225 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1612 days newer than Xeon E3-1225.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1225
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 0% better in Valorant than Xeon E3-1225 - 694 vs 693 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1225 - 51 vs 95 Watts
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
694
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.07/FPS
100%
Price, €
€51.75
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €51.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1225 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD P3000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |