Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Pentium P6200 vs Celeron G4900

Pentium P6200 vs Celeron G4900: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2746 days newer than Pentium P6200.

Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200

  • Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts

Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900

  • Performs up to 97% better in League of Legends than Pentium P6200 - 69 vs 35 FPS
  • Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
This is a free version of League of Legends.
League of Legends

League of Legends

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


FPS

35

50%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


FPS

69

100%

Value, €/FPS

€0.87/FPS

100%

Price, €

€60.24

100%

FPS and Value Winner

Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151

Buy for 60.24 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 221 minutes ago

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Very High

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018

Geekbench 5 Benchmarks

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo
Pentium P6200

Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010


Single-Core

283

45%

Multi-Core

475

45%

Intel Celeron G4900 Logo
Celeron G4900

Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018


Single-Core

616

100%

Multi-Core

1051

100%

Intel Pentium P6200 Logo

Intel Pentium P6200

vs
Intel Celeron G4900 Logo

Intel Celeron G4900

Sep 26th, 2010Release Date
Apr 3rd, 2018
PentiumCollectionCeleron
ArrandaleCodenameCoffee Lake
Intel Socket G1SocketIntel Socket 1151
Mobile
Segment
Desktop
2Cores2
2Threads2
2.1 GHzBase Clock Speed
3.1 GHz
Non-TurboTurbo Clock SpeedNon-Turbo
35 W
TDP54 W
32 nmProcess Size
14 nm
16.0xMultiplier
31.0x
NoneIntegrated Graphics
UHD Graphics 610
NoOverclockableNo

Similar CPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.