Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium P6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2746 days newer than Pentium P6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6200
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 97% better in League of Legends than Pentium P6200 - 69 vs 35 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Pentium P6200 doesn't have integrated graphics
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
69
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.87/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 221 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6200 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Arrandale | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |