Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6405 outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6405 is 3305 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6405
- Performs up to 5% better in Elden Ring than FX-6200 - 115 vs 110 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 58 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6405 - 6 vs 4 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium Gold G6405 | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Pentium Gold | Collection | FX |
Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 3 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
58 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |