Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Pentium G840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 2272 days newer than Pentium G840.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G840
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 7% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Pentium G840 - 291 vs 273 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G840 - 24 vs 2 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
291
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.3/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 167 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 22nd, 2011
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G840 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
May 22nd, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |