Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium G645T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 2039 days newer than Pentium G645T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645T
- Consumes up to 35% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 35 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 21% better in FIFA 23 than Pentium G645T - 105 vs 87 FPS
FIFA 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
105
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645T | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
35 W | TDP | 54 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |