Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Pentium G645 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G645 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 1824 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G645.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G645
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €10.0 vs €180.0
- Up to 93% better value when playing Starfield than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.23 vs €3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 25% better in Starfield than Pentium G645 - 55 vs 44 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G645 - 16 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €10 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15294 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
7%
Price, €
€180
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15295 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G645 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Pentium | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |