Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1920X outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is 1018 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 4 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Performs up to 10% better in New World than Core M-5Y10c - 110 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core M-5Y10c - 24 vs 4 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.83/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.42
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Broadwell | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |