Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core M-5Y10c on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 1714 days newer than Core M-5Y10c.
Advantages of Intel Core M-5Y10c
- Consumes up to 94% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 4 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 5% better in Escape From Tarkov than Core M-5Y10c - 201 vs 191 FPS
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
201
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.43
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €72.43 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 27th, 2014
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core M-5Y10c | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Oct 27th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core M | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
Intel BGA 1234 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
0.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
8.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 5300 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |