Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 397 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than Athlon 3000G - 277 vs 266 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - €64.99 vs €695.4
- Up to 90% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i9-9900X - €0.24 vs €2.51 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €695.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 110 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
266
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.24/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Athlon |
Skylake | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
165 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |