Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 32 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-10900X - €80.0 vs €707.33
- Up to 88% better value when playing Remnant II than Core i9-10900X - €0.96 vs €7.86 per FPS
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 8% better in Remnant II than Athlon 3000G - 90 vs 83 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 20 vs 4 threads
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
90
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.86/FPS
12%
Price, €
€707.33
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €707.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Picasso | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |