Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 1427 days newer than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €80.0 vs €577.0
- Up to 84% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-14900KF - €0.61 vs €3.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 16% better in The Last of Us Part I than Athlon 3000G - 152 vs 131 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 32 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €80 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Buy for €577 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1083 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |