Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 397 days older than the more expensive Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 4% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Athlon 3000G - 161 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 70% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - €16.99 vs €56.29
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €56.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Buy for €16.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
57.37410071942446%
Multi-Core
1975
24.811557788944725%
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |