Buy on Amazon
€64.99
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $488
Availability
MSRP in USD: $488
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900K outperforms the cheaper Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Athlon 3000G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900K is 397 days older than the cheaper Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-9900K - €64.99 vs €585.0
- Up to 88% better value when playing Valheim than Core i9-9900K - €0.33 vs €2.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in Valheim than Athlon 3000G - 205 vs 195 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 16 vs 4 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
195
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.33/FPS
100%
Price, €
€64.99
100%
Value Winner
AMD Athlon 3000G 3.5 GHz Dual-Core Quad-Thread Tray-Processor CPU YD3000C6M2OFH AM4 Sockel
Buy for €64.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9900K Prozessor (16M Cache, bis zu 5,00 GHz)
Buy for €585 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Core i9-9900K
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
|---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Athlon | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
