Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-13900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1439 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900X - 136 vs 108 FPS
- Up to 22% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - €558.79 vs €713.74
- Up to 38% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-9900X - €4.11 vs €6.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 125 vs 165 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900X - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €713.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3961 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.11/FPS
100%
Price, €
€558.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €558.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3960 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |