Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KS outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KS is 2800 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KS
- Performs up to 21% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-6200 - 138 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KS - 125 vs 127 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 192 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KS | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Oct 28th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
4.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
127 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
40.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |