Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 4041 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 35% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Celeron G530 - 157 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €20.16 vs €495.9
- Up to 95% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i9-13900KF - €0.17 vs €3.16 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €495.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
116
73%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 274 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |