Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3229 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €20.16 vs €579.7
- Up to 96% better value when playing Need For Speed Unbound than Ryzen 9 3900XT - €0.17 vs €3.89 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 65 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 24% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Celeron G530 - 149 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 24 vs 2 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
120
80%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
Buy for €579.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G530 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |