Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 3222 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 222 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €35.49 vs €514.01
- Up to 91% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-13900KF - €0.21 vs €2.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KF - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
222
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.32/FPS
9%
Price, €
€514.01
6%
FPS Winner
Buy for €514.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
168
75%
Value, €/FPS
€0.21/FPS
100%
Price, €
€35.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €35.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KF | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |