Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1874 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 137 vs 121 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €82.0 vs €849.0
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 233 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
121
88.32116788321169%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
€82
100%
Buy for €82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 234 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Single-Core
1174
39.4754539340955%
Multi-Core
6976
34.62378399841175%
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |