Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 560 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 57% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-10105 - 587 vs 375 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €82.04 vs €528.83
- Up to 76% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900K - €0.22 vs €0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
587
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.9/FPS
24%
Price, €
€528.83
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
375
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€82.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €82.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 183 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i3-10105 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |