Buy on Amazon
€86.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $649
Availability
MSRP in USD: $649
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105 is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 152 vs 150 FPS
- Up to 78% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €86.9 vs €399.99
- Up to 79% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.57 vs €2.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10105 - 24 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
152
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€86.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10105 10. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.7GHz Tuboboost: 4.4GHz, 4 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070110105
Buy for €86.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen ThreadRipper 2920X 3.5GHz 12-Core 24 Gewinde 32MB Cache TR4 Sockel OEM, YD292XA8UC9AF
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 115 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10105
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
