Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1995 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 57% better in Dirt 5 than Ryzen 5 1600X - 263 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600X - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 1600X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600X
- Up to 93% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €38.9 vs €528.83
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i9-13900K - €0.23 vs €2.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
263
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
11%
Price, €
€528.83
7%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
168
63%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€38.9
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €38.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600X |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Summit Ridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |