Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-860 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-860 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 4767 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-860.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 39% better in Far Cry 5 than Core i7-860 - 255 vs 183 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-860 - 32 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-860 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-860
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €45.78 vs €520.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Far Cry 5 than Core i9-13900K - €0.25 vs €2.04 per FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 95 vs 125 Watts
Far Cry 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.04/FPS
12%
Price, €
€520.99
8%
FPS Winner
Buy for €520.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
Buy for €45.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 8th, 2009
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Core i7-860 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2009 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Lynnfield |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |