Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900F is 1372 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900F
- Performs up to 30% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Celeron G4900 - 153 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 24 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
118
77%
Value, €/FPS
€0.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
24 | Threads | 2 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |