Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900 outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900 is 2705 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900
- Performs up to 9% better in Valheim than Celeron G1620 - 206 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 20 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.8/FPS
100%
Price, €
€370.47
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €370.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
24.002347417840376%
Multi-Core
723
8.585678660491627%
Intel Core i9-10900 | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 2 |
20 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |