Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G530 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G530 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700KF is 2683 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G530.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700KF
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G530 - 246 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G530 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G530
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i7-9700KF - €20.16 vs €383.39
- Up to 94% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i7-9700KF - €0.09 vs €1.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €383.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
228
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700KF | vs | Intel Celeron G530 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i7 | Collection | Celeron |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |