Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-6600K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-6600K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1391 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-6600K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i5-6600K - 169 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i5-6600K - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6600K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6600K
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €70.95 vs €496.71
- Up to 86% better value when playing The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i7-9700F - €0.42 vs €2.94 per FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.94/FPS
14%
Price, €
€496.71
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
167
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€70.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €70.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 119 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-6600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |