Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 1330 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-6300.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 4% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-6300 - 134 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - €119.82 vs €496.71
- Up to 75% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-9700F - €0.93 vs €3.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.71/FPS
25%
Price, €
€496.71
24%
FPS Winner
Buy for €496.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 842 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
129
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€119.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €119.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1058 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |