Buy on Amazon
€74.07
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Core i7-950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 3687 days newer than Core i7-950.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-950
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than Core i7-950 - 268 vs 252 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-950 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-950 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
268
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.28/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G 4,2GHz AM4 6MB Cache Wraith Spire
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15518 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i7-950
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2009
Ryzen 3 3200G
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-950 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Bloomfield | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 130 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using Core i7-950 or Ryzen 3 3200G
F1 22, 1920 x 1080, Ultra High
52 FPS
€13.83/FPS
Radeon RX 6400
Ryzen 3 3200G
16 GB, 500 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€719
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
