Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Core i7-875K on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 3048 days newer than Core i7-875K.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-875K
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 42% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Core i7-875K - 98 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-875K - 24 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for €309.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 30th, 2010
Single-Core
509
39.95290423861852%
Multi-Core
1761
23.624899382881676%
Intel Core i7-875K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 30th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Lynnfield | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |