Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 3574 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 21% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-820QM - 267 vs 220 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 24 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i7-820QM
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Clarksfield | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 8 | Threads | 24 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 45 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 13.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
