Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 9% better in Overwatch 2 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 367 vs 338 FPS
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 105 vs 120 Watts
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
367
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.61/FPS
100%
Price, €
€225.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €225.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4359 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Matisse | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
12 | Cores | 12 |
24 | Threads | 24 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |