Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7551P outperforms Core i7-820QM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7551P is 2836 days newer than Core i7-820QM.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-820QM
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 45 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i7-820QM - 235 vs 228 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-820QM - 64 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 23rd, 2009
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-820QM | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
---|---|---|
Sep 23rd, 2009 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | EPYC |
Clarksfield | Codename | Naples |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 32 |
8 | Threads | 64 |
1.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 180 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
13.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |